KirkCaraway.com - hillary - Comments

Hillary should have won

Singapore Seminars — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:39:52 -0700

If Hillary had focused on the small caucuses earlier she wouldn't have lost the race.

Obama all the way.

Racing Schools — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:41:54 -0700

Obama has liven up all the expectations to date.

Well that's a nice way to

Salicylic — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:01:04 -0700

Well that's a nice way to dismiss any necessary critical thinking over policy differences in the election.

good points about Hillary and her heart

NVMojo — Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:53:14 -0700

I do think she would have won in 2004. Never thought about it until I read this.

To me, it's still difficult

Lifeplayer — Sun, 11 May 2008 03:41:25 -0700

To me, it's still difficult to predict who has the higher chance to win the match. Politic is like a soccer match & the ball is always round.

So the next president will

Rasterbator — Wed, 07 May 2008 12:35:52 -0700

So the next president will be Obama..
BTW i am very confused with American system of election...:(

I may not drink much soda,

Anonymous — Thu, 01 May 2008 11:58:26 -0700

I may not drink much soda, but I can tell that she's trying to work the soda machine. The coffee machine is to her left. Since you can't tell the difference, I'm not sure who the out of touch one is.

What you don't understand...

Anonymous — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:20:08 -0700

You are a democrat. You have no rights, other than your party's line. Start practicing your goose-step. Resistance is futile. You have been assimilated.

Obama

Moody — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:50:02 -0700

Obama is not a good choice for president: He sat in a church for over 20 years and listened to hate filled spewing from a "mentor"? He then tries to claim he never heard the most serious hatered from the rev. Well Mr. Obama how about the books and articles witten and co-written by this rev.'s own daughters through those 20 years? Obama is also going to say that he never received those hate filled news latters at his door?
I find that almost impossible to believe.

What speech did you listen to?

kc — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:55:57 -0700

Where in this speech does Obama agree with Rev. Wright's policies? Did you actually listen to the speech?

Also, Obama is the candidate who has more elected delegates, and leads in the popular vote. For him to lose, it would take those "head honchos" overturning the verdict of the voters to give Hillary Clinton the nomination.

Superdelegates

Anonymous — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 09:48:45 -0700

What I don't understand is with the talk about superdelegates and pledgedelegates, that means from what an CNN anchor said, our votes are worthless. Where is our Constitutional right to have the FREEDOM to vote for a candidate? If these super rich, "Mr. or Mrs. I Am The Much More Important Super Voter" can choose the person to run for the Presidential Office of the United States, than the regular voter, where are our rights? We pay taxes just as they do, which should give us our chance to enter our vote saying who we think is the best choice for the candidate to this office. I don't believe Barack Obama didn't know what kind of language his minister used in his so called sermons. You can't convince me even if he wasn't in attendance that day this sermon was spewed, that some member of the congregation didn't tell him. He defends the man who took the Lord's name in vain. That is not what I want representing my government as it's President. And he can also stop blaming Hillary Clinton and John McCain for his political problems when they come up. If the Democratic head honchos put this man in office, I will certainly change parties before the next Presidential race comes around. I hear the talk about a split in the Democratic Party..In my opinion that has already happened because of Obama and I had nothing against this candidate before I heard him defending his minister and agreeing with some of his policies. He is not my choice.

Attack about what you are doing...

Bill — Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:27:38 -0800

Apparently this is the strategy of the Clinton campaign: if you are doing something wrong, blame the other party for it. When you contact Canada, say the other party is doing it. When you are going to Pergure speeches from your husband and Edwards, blame the other party for pergury. When you claim to have experience you don't have, blame the other party for them not having experience. Apparently whatever the Clinton administration says about Obama is a reflection of their own.

Obama will win presidential nomination -projection

Danny — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 05:38:42 -0800

CNN's delegate counter game was quite useful.
My unbiased projection is that Obama will win between 2040 to 2080 delegates (after adding the super delegates). This is considering that Hillary gets atleast 60 percent of superdelegate votes and Florida,Michigan votes not counted.
I just went thru the population stats of each state to decide the pattern.
I am neither an American nor staying in America. But these elections have become so interesting that people around the world are getting involved

Well when Pennsylvania

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:23:02 -0800

Well when Pennsylvania learns of good old Bill Clintons dirty dealings in his last election when the senate investigation begins it will be Hillary's turn to do some back peddling.

hillary and obama

Anonymous — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:43:38 -0800

Both of these bleeding liberals will be unemployed after November. Oh my!!!!!!!!!! Where is all of the media on global warming hogwash? Gore better stir the fire and BS!