<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://kirkcaraway.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>KirkCaraway.com - republicans - Comments</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/tags/republicans</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;republicans&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I agree. The point of the</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/04/01/2008/real_story_iowa_gop_trouble#comment-570</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree. The point of the post was to show that Democrats turned out in massive numbers compared to Republicans in a pretty conservative state. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 18:11:31 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 570 at http://kirkcaraway.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Real Story?</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/04/01/2008/real_story_iowa_gop_trouble#comment-569</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You should never lump elections together. There was a Republican Caucus and a Democratic Caucus. Extrapolating Hukabee&#039;s percentage is misleading when you realize that the big loser of the night, HR Clinton, got almost TWICE as many votes as the Republican WINNER! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The big winner is the Democratic Party with an energized voter base out for Republican hide.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:47:12 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chandler in lasvegas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 569 at http://kirkcaraway.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
