<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://kirkcaraway.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>KirkCaraway.com - Clinton campaign and the NAFTA/Canada scadal - Comments</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/06/03/2008/clinton_campaign_and_the_naftacanada_scadal</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Clinton campaign and the NAFTA/Canada scadal&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Attack about what you are doing...</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/06/03/2008/clinton_campaign_and_the_naftacanada_scadal#comment-603</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Apparently this is the strategy of the Clinton campaign: if you are doing something wrong, blame the other party for it.  When you contact Canada, say the other party is doing it.  When you are going to Pergure speeches from your husband and Edwards, blame the other party for pergury.  When you claim to have experience you don&#039;t have, blame the other party for them not having experience.  Apparently whatever the Clinton administration says about Obama is a reflection of their own.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:27:38 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 603 at http://kirkcaraway.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clinton campaign and the NAFTA/Canada scadal</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/06/03/2008/clinton_campaign_and_the_naftacanada_scadal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It would seem from the exit polling that Clinton hitting Obama for one of his campaign advisers telling the Canadians that all that NAFTA stuff was just talk actually swayed a lot of votes her way. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But now we learn &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080305.wnafta06/EmailBNStory/National/home&quot;&gt;it was the Clinton campaign that was speaking with forked tongue:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mr. Brodie, apparently seeking to play down the potential impact on Canada, told the reporters the threat was not serious, and that someone from Ms. Clinton&#039;s campaign had even contacted Canadian diplomats to tell them not to worry because the NAFTA threats were mostly political posturing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, Ohio, maybe you&#039;d like a do-over? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pretty ballsy for the Clinton campaign to attack on that point that they were the guilty party. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://kirkcaraway.com/06/03/2008/clinton_campaign_and_the_naftacanada_scadal#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://kirkcaraway.com/tags/hillary">hillary</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:32:06 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">585 at http://kirkcaraway.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
