<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://kirkcaraway.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>KirkCaraway.com - Negatives for Mitt - Comments</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/24/08/2007/negatives_mitt</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Negatives for Mitt&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Negatives for Mitt</title>
 <link>http://kirkcaraway.com/24/08/2007/negatives_mitt</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The story goes that Hillary Clinton can&#039;t win the general election because her negatives are so high. But along comes Mitt Romney, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americablog.com/2007/08/mitt-moves-up-in-polls.html&quot;&gt;who now has higher negatives than Clinton&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, are we going to see the same stories about how Mitt can&#039;t be elected? Just wondering. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://kirkcaraway.com/24/08/2007/negatives_mitt#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://kirkcaraway.com/tags/hillary_clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://kirkcaraway.com/tags/mitt_romney">mitt romney</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 07:18:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kc</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">383 at http://kirkcaraway.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
